<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The SharePoint Utility Suite is Dead</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.krichie.com/2007/01/18/the-sharepoint-utility-suite-is-dead/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.krichie.com/2007/01/18/the-sharepoint-utility-suite-is-dead/</link>
	<description>It's a household name</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 19:01:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ali</title>
		<link>http://blog.krichie.com/2007/01/18/the-sharepoint-utility-suite-is-dead/#comment-7532</link>
		<dc:creator>Ali</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 15:36:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.krichie.com/2007/01/18/the-sharepoint-utility-suite-is-dead/#comment-7532</guid>
		<description>The command i am running is stsadm -o migrateuser -oldlogin moss\user1 -newlogin moss\user2 -ignoresidhistory.

it completes successfully but it still appear as moss\user1 in the web application, and also in the profiles page in the shared services provider, however i can login now only with user2 and when i open the edit page od the profile properties of user1 in the central administration i see the account name set to User2.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The command i am running is stsadm -o migrateuser -oldlogin moss\user1 -newlogin moss\user2 -ignoresidhistory.</p>
<p>it completes successfully but it still appear as moss\user1 in the web application, and also in the profiles page in the shared services provider, however i can login now only with user2 and when i open the edit page od the profile properties of user1 in the central administration i see the account name set to User2.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ali</title>
		<link>http://blog.krichie.com/2007/01/18/the-sharepoint-utility-suite-is-dead/#comment-7531</link>
		<dc:creator>Ali</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 15:29:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.krichie.com/2007/01/18/the-sharepoint-utility-suite-is-dead/#comment-7531</guid>
		<description>I am using SharePoint 2007 SP2 with latest cumulative updates.
Actually stsadm is not failing it is giving operation completed successfully howevere when i check the user still have the old display name when i check the site &quot;People and Groups&quot; page</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am using SharePoint 2007 SP2 with latest cumulative updates.<br />
Actually stsadm is not failing it is giving operation completed successfully howevere when i check the user still have the old display name when i check the site &#8220;People and Groups&#8221; page</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith Richie</title>
		<link>http://blog.krichie.com/2007/01/18/the-sharepoint-utility-suite-is-dead/#comment-7530</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith Richie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 15:11:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.krichie.com/2007/01/18/the-sharepoint-utility-suite-is-dead/#comment-7530</guid>
		<description>SPUserUtil makes the same exact call that stsadm -o migrate does.
so, if it is failing for you, so would SPUserUtil.   What version of SharePoint are you trying to migrate on?
SPUserUtil is only designed for V2 (WSS 2.0/SPS 2007).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SPUserUtil makes the same exact call that stsadm -o migrate does.<br />
so, if it is failing for you, so would SPUserUtil.   What version of SharePoint are you trying to migrate on?<br />
SPUserUtil is only designed for V2 (WSS 2.0/SPS 2007).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ali</title>
		<link>http://blog.krichie.com/2007/01/18/the-sharepoint-utility-suite-is-dead/#comment-7529</link>
		<dc:creator>Ali</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 14:57:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.krichie.com/2007/01/18/the-sharepoint-utility-suite-is-dead/#comment-7529</guid>
		<description>Can you send me a copy of the SPUserUtil, i am migrating users from a domain to another, i&#039;ve tried to use the stsadm - migrateuser but it has some issues.
Anyway, what is the difference between stsadm -migrateuser and SPUserUtil?

Thanks in advance</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can you send me a copy of the SPUserUtil, i am migrating users from a domain to another, i&#8217;ve tried to use the stsadm &#8211; migrateuser but it has some issues.<br />
Anyway, what is the difference between stsadm -migrateuser and SPUserUtil?</p>
<p>Thanks in advance</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Disappointed in '07</title>
		<link>http://blog.krichie.com/2007/01/18/the-sharepoint-utility-suite-is-dead/#comment-6527</link>
		<dc:creator>Disappointed in '07</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 19:22:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.krichie.com/2007/01/18/the-sharepoint-utility-suite-is-dead/#comment-6527</guid>
		<description>Keith,

Any chance of a Christmas present of the ol&#039; Sharepoint Utility Suite?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Keith,</p>
<p>Any chance of a Christmas present of the ol&#8217; Sharepoint Utility Suite?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith Richie</title>
		<link>http://blog.krichie.com/2007/01/18/the-sharepoint-utility-suite-is-dead/#comment-4761</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith Richie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2007 19:44:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.krichie.com/2007/01/18/the-sharepoint-utility-suite-is-dead/#comment-4761</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t go into all the legal details, but there were issues with Support and those tools being out there.     I have gotten approval to repost them, and as soon as I can, I&#039;ll be working on it.  I apologize for any inconvienience this has caused for you, but in trying to be fair to support, etc, it had to happen at that time.
I didn&#039;t &quot;Break&quot; the links and hide the code...The Web Component directory where the tools were first at, was decommissioned.   I only had SPSiteManager on CodePlex, but due to support issues with Microsoft, I had to take it down.  Since then, it was allowed to be reposted, but I&#039;ve been requested to put some additional disclaimers back in the code before I do that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t go into all the legal details, but there were issues with Support and those tools being out there.     I have gotten approval to repost them, and as soon as I can, I&#8217;ll be working on it.  I apologize for any inconvienience this has caused for you, but in trying to be fair to support, etc, it had to happen at that time.<br />
I didn&#8217;t &#8220;Break&#8221; the links and hide the code&#8230;The Web Component directory where the tools were first at, was decommissioned.   I only had SPSiteManager on CodePlex, but due to support issues with Microsoft, I had to take it down.  Since then, it was allowed to be reposted, but I&#8217;ve been requested to put some additional disclaimers back in the code before I do that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: matt</title>
		<link>http://blog.krichie.com/2007/01/18/the-sharepoint-utility-suite-is-dead/#comment-4760</link>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2007 19:26:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.krichie.com/2007/01/18/the-sharepoint-utility-suite-is-dead/#comment-4760</guid>
		<description>I agree with Steve.  Kind of cheap keeping all the posts up, but yanking the code from CodePlex and breaking all the links.

-matt</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Steve.  Kind of cheap keeping all the posts up, but yanking the code from CodePlex and breaking all the links.</p>
<p>-matt</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Dominion</title>
		<link>http://blog.krichie.com/2007/01/18/the-sharepoint-utility-suite-is-dead/#comment-3709</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Dominion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2007 15:56:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.krichie.com/2007/01/18/the-sharepoint-utility-suite-is-dead/#comment-3709</guid>
		<description>I noticed your blog is filled with articles about these supposedly fabulous tools, and the links are all dead, so I was wondering what happened -- I mean, it looks pretty incompetent right now -- maybe you should edit the blog, and remove all your claims about the wonderful tools -- you did say you deliberately broke all the links and hid the code, so it just looks sleazy to leave up all the advertising, dontcha think?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I noticed your blog is filled with articles about these supposedly fabulous tools, and the links are all dead, so I was wondering what happened &#8212; I mean, it looks pretty incompetent right now &#8212; maybe you should edit the blog, and remove all your claims about the wonderful tools &#8212; you did say you deliberately broke all the links and hid the code, so it just looks sleazy to leave up all the advertising, dontcha think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reviving SPSiteManager &#171; Krichie - That SharePoint Guy</title>
		<link>http://blog.krichie.com/2007/01/18/the-sharepoint-utility-suite-is-dead/#comment-2731</link>
		<dc:creator>Reviving SPSiteManager &#171; Krichie - That SharePoint Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jun 2007 13:04:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.krichie.com/2007/01/18/the-sharepoint-utility-suite-is-dead/#comment-2731</guid>
		<description>[...]  As noted in my previous post, The SharePoint Utility Suite is Dead, my goal was to not enhance them, nor could I provide any real support for them.&#160;&#160; There [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  As noted in my previous post, The SharePoint Utility Suite is Dead, my goal was to not enhance them, nor could I provide any real support for them.&nbsp;&nbsp; There [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Just because the SharePoint Utility Suite is Dead, doesn&#8217;t mean I am nor those needs are &#171; Krichie - That SharePoint Guy</title>
		<link>http://blog.krichie.com/2007/01/18/the-sharepoint-utility-suite-is-dead/#comment-85</link>
		<dc:creator>Just because the SharePoint Utility Suite is Dead, doesn&#8217;t mean I am nor those needs are &#171; Krichie - That SharePoint Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 03:40:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.krichie.com/2007/01/18/the-sharepoint-utility-suite-is-dead/#comment-85</guid>
		<description>[...] Utility Suite is Dead, doesn&#8217;t mean I am nor those needs&#160;are  In my previous post &#8220;The SharePoint Utility Suite is Dead&#8221; I think I failed to note that another reason it was dead, is that I do not own the right to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Utility Suite is Dead, doesn&#8217;t mean I am nor those needs&nbsp;are  In my previous post &#8220;The SharePoint Utility Suite is Dead&#8221; I think I failed to note that another reason it was dead, is that I do not own the right to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
