http://blog.krichie.com/2007/04/11/spwebhasuniqueroledefinitions-useless/ It's a household name Mon, 30 Aug 2010 19:01:23 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ http://blog.krichie.com/2007/04/11/spwebhasuniqueroledefinitions-useless/#comment-7221 Randy Wed, 10 Dec 2008 12:54:37 +0000 http://blog.krichie.com/2007/04/11/spwebhasuniqueroledefinitions-useless/#comment-7221 I know this topic is over a year old, but I stumbled onto the same issue, but found that if you call SPWeb.RoleDefinitions.BreakInheritance(false, false) that trips the SPWeb.HasUniqueRoleDefinitions flag. I think the SPWeb.BreakRoleInheritance method only disassociates the RoleAssignments from the Parent Web. It does not touch the RoleDefinitions, and the HasUniqueRoleDefinitions flag is looking for a break at the "permission level", which is deeper. I know this topic is over a year old, but I stumbled onto the same issue, but found that if you call SPWeb.RoleDefinitions.BreakInheritance(false, false) that trips the SPWeb.HasUniqueRoleDefinitions flag. I think the SPWeb.BreakRoleInheritance method only disassociates the RoleAssignments from the Parent Web. It does not touch the RoleDefinitions, and the HasUniqueRoleDefinitions flag is looking for a break at the “permission level”, which is deeper.

]]> http://blog.krichie.com/2007/04/11/spwebhasuniqueroledefinitions-useless/#comment-5527 Yuliy Pisetsky Fri, 02 Nov 2007 18:14:47 +0000 http://blog.krichie.com/2007/04/11/spwebhasuniqueroledefinitions-useless/#comment-5527 While there may not be role definition duplication, the role definitions can still be shared. Breaking role inheritance means that the set of role definitions for that web is distinct from its parent, not that there's a copy of each role definition created. While there may not be role definition duplication, the role definitions can still be shared. Breaking role inheritance means that the set of role definitions for that web is distinct from its parent, not that there’s a copy of each role definition created.

]]> http://blog.krichie.com/2007/04/11/spwebhasuniqueroledefinitions-useless/#comment-5101 Keith Richie Tue, 18 Sep 2007 21:00:55 +0000 http://blog.krichie.com/2007/04/11/spwebhasuniqueroledefinitions-useless/#comment-5101 I think the key was that if the web didn't truly have unique role definitions, then it should report False. It's been awhile since I looked at this, and should go back as soon as I can and ensure that I was right when I hit this I think the key was that if the web didn’t truly have unique role definitions, then it should report False.
It’s been awhile since I looked at this, and should go back as soon as I can and ensure that I was right when I hit this

]]> http://blog.krichie.com/2007/04/11/spwebhasuniqueroledefinitions-useless/#comment-5099 mahongzhou Tue, 18 Sep 2007 20:37:42 +0000 http://blog.krichie.com/2007/04/11/spwebhasuniqueroledefinitions-useless/#comment-5099 have you tried SPWeb.FirstUniqueRoleDefinitionWeb? have you tried SPWeb.FirstUniqueRoleDefinitionWeb?

]]>